How to Upload a Project Fromreaper to Youtuube Mb3

04-11-2015, 05:48 AM	#1
Man with feelings Bring together Date: Mar 2013 Posts: 139	Using Reaper to embed runway into Youtube video Hullo. If I want to embed a track into Youtube video, like practice many musicians that publish their music tracks with video, what is the all-time format and options to save a rails? What is nigh laws - tin I utilise mp3 (Youtube is in USA, Google - so the laws applicable is U.s.?)? If I earn money on my video in Youtube what laws are applicable (can rails be published and how taxes are payed)? Does the license of LAME encoder allows the commercial apply of tracks? I am Russian resident.

04-11-2015, 04:29 PM	#2
Homo being with feelings Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 668	Just regarding AudioVideo sync, Reaper makes it pretty like shooting fish in a barrel. Y'all just load the video on one rails, scootch it all the way to the left, lock it in time, open the video window, and then build your project around that, as far every bit the sync. When you're done, render out just a WAV file, and it volition be extremely easy to plop the video+wav in your video editor and they volition be in perfect sync (well, as perfect as your reaper projection was, anyway). I do this all the time when recording audio with an external microphone/device, for live performances, during gigs or just my sleeping accommodation. Way ameliorate than the on-camera microphone. Regarding copyright constabulary - the offset rule of thumb is never to employ anyone else's content without their permission. You can get a strike on your youtube business relationship for that, in addition to violating copyright law. Youtube volition be specially harsh if you effort to monetize someone else'south video content, or audio content, or both - y'all may receive instant account termination. Having said that - fair use does seem to apply very easily if you're using the original content as a small piece within your own commentary or storytelling. For instance, if you lot show a few seconds of someone else's video, and then switch to your own content/commentary for awhile - like review videos, biography videos, response videos, etc. Likewise note that it is a very common misconception that "no profit"===fair use. __________________ ~~~ Proud Reaper License Owner! ~~~

04-13-2015, 07:13 AM	#3
Human existence with feelings Join Appointment: Mar 2013 Posts: 139	Thanks. So the video creating is a technical process and rather clear. I will employ only my own content (music, photos of a place in some other country and other). So If I tape in WAV with Reaper commercial version with NI Samples (that are free for commercial utilize) and embed information technology to video, all is OK with copyright and commercial use? So I have no deal with MP3 and licensing of MP3 for commercial use. So Youtube is going to use my track And as for commercial use - If I put a MP3 rail to websites only without making directly cash on it, is it commercial? Must I license MP3 for that? How much I can earn on Youtube such way with ads and how to pay taxes (which laws are applicable)? Final edited by tramway11; 04-13-2015 at 09:55 AM.

04-13-2015, 03:39 PM	#4
Human with feelings Bring together Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 668	Yep I'grand pretty sure once y'all purchase NI (or whatever/most other sample based VSTi's), y'all're okay to render and utilize annihilation you want, equally long every bit you're not rendering out all the blank samples (every bit in duplicating the library). Y'all probably want to double check with NI's license agreement though. I'm not enlightened of when your website would be considered commercial use by Mp3. Only if y'all want to stay super duper legal, you can probably observe a flash thespian that can play the OGG format, and use that to render/upload to your website instead of Mp3. OGG is the open source / free alternative to Mp3, I think. Equally for earnings on youtube... it's going to be incredibly difficult to make any existent money, but the journeying is still fun and worth having, only for the sake of fun. On average, people seem to brand anywhere betwixt $0.75 to $15 per CPM, leaning more towards the low side for smaller accounts, with CPM meaning your earnings per i,000 views. So if you make videos that get hundreds of views, and release several per month... you're looking at like ... a few bucks. Every bit for paying taxes on youtube earnings and deeper topics like that - you're probably better off going to the google/youtube forums. *non a lawyer, not legal advice* __________________ ~~~ Proud Reaper License Owner! ~~~

04-13-2015, ten:45 PM	#five
Homo beingness with feelings Join Date: Dec 2014 Location: Ruhr Expanse, Germany Posts: 976	Quote: Originally Posted past mikeypee OGG is the open source / costless alternative to Mp3, I think. Ogg is much better than MP3 and doesn't require a licence fee. __________________ Greetings from Germany Chris

04-14-2015, 01:25 AM	#6
Homo with feelings Bring together Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 668	I just wanted to share this link: http://www.schillmania.com/projects/soundmanager2/ It's a javascript library that makes playing sound actually easy. I wrote a simple jukebox app for i of my websites, and I'yard hoping to detect the fourth dimension once again to convert my entire discography folio over to information technology, also. It supports OGG... so ... aye. __________________ ~~~ Proud Reaper License Owner! ~~~

04-fourteen-2015, 01:38 AM	#7
Human with feelings Join Date: Dec 2014 Location: Ruhr Expanse, Germany Posts: 976	Quote: Originally Posted by Aymara Ogg is much better than MP3 ... Case: If I rip a CD with 224 kBit in Ogg the quality is much better than MP3 in 320 kBit ... abolutely baloney gratis bass section and no treble cut-off above 15 kHz. Therefore I will never sympathise why this MP3 crap is still used today. __________________ Greetings from Germany Chris

04-14-2015, 03:thirteen AM	#viii
Human being beingness with feelings Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 668	Quote: Originally Posted by Aymara Example: If I rip a CD with 224 kBit in Ogg the quality is much improve than MP3 in 320 kBit ... abolutely distortion free bass section and no treble cut-off above xv kHz. Therefore I volition never sympathize why this MP3 crap is still used today. Wow ... I did not know that. I always causeless OGG was worse because it was free, and "costless" was what made people say it was improve. Dang ... now I'm thinking about converting my fashion of thinking over to OGG. My guess as to why people are still with Mp3, is we take a hard time moving on from 1 company/make once we've already picked something. People don't like to think so they but go "Oh, music file format? Mp3" without thinking whatsoever further nearly quality. I'm guilty of it myself as well, this time around. Fortunately I'll change considering technology allows me to.. but I'1000 guessing the average person doesn't know, or doesn't care. :'( __________________ ~~~ Proud Reaper License Owner! ~~~

04-14-2015, 04:xv AM	#9
Human being with feelings Bring together Date: Dec 2014 Location: Ruhr Area, Germany Posts: 976	Quote: Originally Posted past mikeypee My estimate equally to why people are still with Mp3, is ... There are two main reasons, why Ogg didn't wipe away MP3: 1. Ogg was ignored / boycotted past many hardware & software vendors, MP3 wasn't. These idiots payed MP3 licence fees instead of pushing Ogg ... managers ... no comment ii. The majority of users don't know, that Ogg has a much ameliorate quality than MP3. Rip a CD in Ogg quality setting vii (224 kBit) and do a blind test with the ripped WAV ... you will be having a hard fourth dimension to hear a difference, which will need loftier end equipment and very good ears And a terminal reason is, that due to lower storage prices the trend goes over to FLAC, which is a skilful matter, considering 1. it's lossless and ii. it allows a quality far improve than CDs. The showtime shops are already open / online, that sell FLACs in 24 flake and 96 kHz ... I hope more will follow this trend, which is a must for audiophile music. __________________ Greetings from Germany Chris Last edited by Aymara; 04-fourteen-2015 at 04:21 AM.

04-fourteen-2015, 04:56 AM	#10
Human being with feelings Join Appointment: Aug 2011 Posts: 668	Definitely definitely. As it is, I already upload WAV or FLAC but to digital distributors (cdbaby, bandcamp). OGG would merely be to put on my website, and perchance a thumb drive to share with new people. __________________ ~~~ Proud Reaper License Owner! ~~~

04-14-2015, 05:13 AM	#11
Human being with feelings Join Date: Dec 2014 Location: Ruhr Area, Germany Posts: 976	Quote: Originally Posted by mikeypee OGG would only be to put on my website, ... I just utilise it on my smartphone, where FLAC would be overkill. __________________ Greetings from Germany Chris

04-fourteen-2015, 05:23 AM	#12
Human with feelings Join Date: Mar 2013 Posts: 139	Cheers! Now I've a track that tin can be seen by 50000 I retrieve for get-go time. How much will information technology be on Youtube? What's better for Youtube - MP3/WAV/OGG? Can I use WAV for Youtube? It's better than other by quality? if size is not important for Youtube

04-14-2015, 09:43 AM	#13
Human being with feelings Bring together Date: Jan 2014 Posts: 4,762	Upload the highest quality you can to Youtube. What you see and hear when you play the video back online will non be the same, simply if the user sets their video setting to the highest the audio will lucifer information technology, roughly. It won't be WAV quality regardless, though. __________________ Check out my hip-hop, funk-rock band Theatre Crisp

04-15-2015, 08:58 AM	#xiv
Homo existence with feelings Join Date: Mar 2013 Posts: 139	Are WAV and OGG, FLAC costless and legal to utilise in all types of streaming (radio, Web) for commercial use, so I can embed WAV and OGG into Youtube video or freely distribute music in these formats in websites for users to download? Also, if I want to sell my music, there are no royalties or any liabilities to any companies with these formats?

04-15-2015, eleven:05 AM	#15
Human being with feelings Bring together Date: Dec 2014 Location: Ruhr Surface area, Germany Posts: 976	Quote: Originally Posted by tramway11 Are WAV and OGG, FLAC free and legal to use ... I'm not 100% sure nearly WAV, because it was developed by Microsoft & IBM, but Ogg Vorbis and FLAC are definitely gratuitous, as you can run across here: http://www.vorbis.com/faq/ https://xiph.org/flac/license.html __________________ Greetings from Germany Chris

04-15-2015, 11:11 AM	#16
Banned Bring together Date: Dec 2011 Location: Oud West, NL Posts: 2,335	By the time you'll ever accept to worry about paying whatsoever sorts of fees for using X algorithm or Y software, etc., to get your business organisation taken intendance of, you'll have real management and a company behind you that will have care of all that rubbish for you (for a fee, of course -- their xx%, etc.) Meanwhile, don't sweat this stuff. Fun to talk about, perhaps, but you lot are all the same a very small fish and will be ignored for a while to come. All-time Wishes.

04-15-2015, 11:26 AM	#17
Man with feelings Join Engagement: Mar 2013 Posts: 139	Cheers

04-nineteen-2015, 10:10 AM	#18
Human being with feelings Join Appointment: Mar 2013 Posts: 139	What's the all-time way to convert from MP3 to OGG without loss of quality?

04-xix-2015, 10:40 AM	#nineteen
Man with feelings Bring together Date: December 2014 Location: Ruhr Area, Germany Posts: 976	Quote: Originally Posted past tramway11 What's the best way to catechumen from MP3 to OGG without loss of quality? That is impossible without loss, because Ogg is NOT lossless. And information technology doesn't make any sense, considering MP3 even sounds baaad and won't audio better, but even worse afterward conversion, because further data loss volition occur. If y'all just want to avert using MP3 for licence reasons, catechumen to FLAC, which is lossless. Or even better, delete the MP3 and rip a CD directly to FLAC or Ogg, if size matters. If conversion from MP3 to Ogg is a must for whatever reason, use a minimum of 224 kBit. When I rip a CD and convert WAV to Ogg in 224 kBit, y'all volition need top notch euqipment and ears to hear a departure. __________________ Greetings from Germany Chris

04-xix-2015, eleven:11 AM	#xx
Banned Join Date: Jul 2014 Location: Usa of Europe, Germany, Chiliad�nchengladbach Posts: ii,047	Quote: Originally Posted past tramway11 ... and how to pay taxes (which laws are applicable)? man, the land you live in has laws. amongst them in that location are - I bet - a few regarding paying taxes on your income. that is where you have to look for how much taxes you have to pay. seriously ... thats not so hard to know.

04-19-2015, xi:33 AM	#21
Human being with feelings Join Engagement: Mar 2013 Posts: 139	Quote: Originally Posted by Aymara If conversion from MP3 to Ogg is a must for whatever reason, use a minimum of 224 kBit. When I rip a CD and convert WAV to Ogg in 224 kBit, you will need top notch euqipment and ears to hear a difference. When trying to become OGG from Reaper, I was getting a file that sound poorer than the initial mix. Frequencies, less fruity... And MP3 that I have sounds pretty well, only for Youtube I must apply anything besides MP3

04-19-2015, 11:35 AM	#22
Man with feelings Join Appointment: Mar 2013 Posts: 139	Quote: Originally Posted by whiteaxxxe human, the country y'all live in has laws. amongst them there are - I bet - a few regarding paying taxes on your income. that is where y'all accept to look for how much taxes yous take to pay. seriously ... thats non so difficult to know. I meant are there any laws that I must pay also by USA laws ))

04-19-2015, 12:08 PM	#23
Human being with feelings Bring together Appointment: December 2014 Location: Ruhr Expanse, Deutschland Posts: 976	Quote: Originally Posted by tramway11 When trying to get OGG from Reaper, I was getting a file that audio poorer than the initial mix. Consign from Reaper to WAV and use Oggdrop for the conversion ... configure Oggdrop for Quality setting 7 (224 kBit). __________________ Greetings from Germany Chris

04-20-2015, 07:xi AM	#24
Homo beingness with feelings Join Appointment: Mar 2013 Posts: 139	And what you can say about FLAC rendering from Reaper? I've got file that has many delays, MP3 was fully ok, simply here all becomes blurry.

04-20-2015, 11:35 AM	#25
Human being with feelings Join Date: Dec 2014 Location: Ruhr Area, Frg Posts: 976	Quote: Originally Posted by tramway11 And what you lot tin can say well-nigh FLAC rendering from Reaper? Give it a try ... I always export WAV from Reaper and convert later, if needed. __________________ Greetings from Germany Chris

04-twenty-2015, 02:17 PM	#26
Human being with feelings Join Date: Mar 2013 Posts: 139	The cool thing is that the MP3 file which I got from Reaper sounds pretty well for me but I can't load it for Youtube, as it uses patented technology. But the quality of FLAC from Reaper is lower than MP3. Do I need a license to my MP3 music if I desire to earn on information technology but revenue is less than $100000? Corresponding to http://mp3licensing.com/royalty/emd.html Then I can load freely on Youtube without license from them

04-20-2015, 04:xi PM	#27
Man being with feelings Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 668	Transport youtube the highest quality possible. What you send them will never reach finish-users anyway; Youtube will re-encode the file to their own format, and will at that point be responsible for codec licensing. Equally for earning money on mp3s... merely use ogg or flac. Mp3s are impaired now, and I've already started to research irresolute my own code. __________________ ~~~ Proud Reaper License Owner! ~~~

04-20-2015, 04:22 PM	#28
Human being being with feelings Bring together Engagement: Jul 2009 Posts: vi,623	__________________ REAPER Video Tutorials, Tips & Tricks and more at The REAPER Blog

04-20-2015, 10:eighteen PM	#29
Man with feelings Join Engagement: Dec 2014 Location: Ruhr Area, Germany Posts: 976	Quote: Originally Posted by mikeypee Send youtube the highest quality possible. That's the best mode to go, considering Youtube does their own lossy conversion, so the source needs to be lossless in best quality to get a good sounding video. Conclusion: Export from Reaper to WAV at least in CD quality (16/44.i). If information technology'due south needed to save HDD space convert to FLAC ... google for "WAV to FLAC converter" to notice an audiophile tool, if Reaper doesn't exercise a good job. But brand sure showtime, that your FLAC player does a good job If you want to earn money with music, deliver audiophile quality! So MP3 is a no-get every bit whatever other lossy codec as well ... at to the lowest degree in my opinion. __________________ Greetings from Germany Chris

04-21-2015, 04:51 AM	#30
Human being beingness with feelings Join Date: Mar 2013 Posts: 139	Thanks! So, even if I upload mp3, I need no license equally broadcasting will be non in mp3?! 100%? Likewise for WAV? And so all seems to be perfect

04-21-2015, 10:51 AM	#31
Human being with feelings Bring together Date: Mar 2013 Posts: 139	I don't understand practice I need a license for MP3, if I will upload on Youtube: (http://mp3licensing.com/help/index.html#four) four) Exercise I need a license to stream mp3 encoded content over the Net? Aye. A license is needed for commercial (i.e., revenue-generating) use of mp3 in circulate systems (terrestrial, satellite, cable and/or other distribution channels), streaming applications (via Internet, intranets and/or other networks), other content distribution systems (pay-audio or audio-on-need applications and the similar) or for use of mp3 on physical media (compact discs, digital versatile discs, semiconductor fries, difficult drives, retentivity cards and the like). Nevertheless, no license is needed for private, non-commercial activities (e.m., dwelling house-entertainment, receiving broadcasts and creating a personal music library), not generating revenue or other consideration of any kind or for entities with associated annual gross revenue less than The states$ 100 000.00. Links: Royalty Rates - Electronic Music Distribution 5) Practice I need a license to distribute mp3 encoded content? Yeah. A license is needed for commercial (i.due east., revenue-generating) employ of mp3 in broadcast systems (terrestrial, satellite, cablevision and/or other distribution channels), streaming applications (via Net, intranets and/or other networks), other content distribution systems (pay-audio or audio-on-demand applications and the like) or for employ of mp3 on physical media (compact discs, digital versatile discs, semiconductor chips, difficult drives, retention cards and the similar). However, no license is needed for private, non-commercial activities (e.g., domicile-entertainment, receiving broadcasts and creating a personal music library), not generating revenue or other consideration of whatsoever kind or for entities with associated annual gross revenue less than U.s.a.$ 100 000.00. Links:

04-21-2015, 07:48 PM	#32
Human beingness with feelings Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 668	Dude we keep trying to tell you - you don't need an Mp3 license for youtube. Information technology's not you who is broadcasting at that point ... it'southward youtube who is broadcasting. Besides, I don't even think their codec is Mp3 anyway ... then moot point. __________________ ~~~ Proud Reaper License Possessor! ~~~

04-21-2015, 09:fifty PM	#33
Man being with feelings Join Date: Dec 2014 Location: Ruhr Area, Germany Posts: 976	Quote: Originally Posted by tramway11 I don't understand do I need a license for MP3 ... In improver to above licencing answer, call up what I said before: If y'all want to make money deliver adept quality, which in my opinion means, use WAV. Whichever audio yous upload, Youtube will compress information technology. If the audio file was already compressed earlier it will sound crappy. And MP3 has two major downsides: treble cut off above 16 kHz and distortion in the bass section. If you want to be sucessful, make sure, that your videos audio better, than the average Youtube crap The competition is a big bunch and so utilise every risk to get noticed. And ameliorate than average audio quality is just one piece in the big puzzle. __________________ Greetings from Federal republic of germany Chris

04-22-2015, 02:23 AM	#34
Human being being with feelings Join Date: Mar 2013 Posts: 139	Then y'all tin bet $1K that I don't need a license for that actually 100%? )) And nobody never had seen or paid such a license when uploading MP3 on Youtube? Because they are dissemination? But WAV which I got from Reaper has poorer sound quality than MP3 (blurry, distortions)! Do I need such license for WAV commercial use? Or besides I'k not a broadcaster, and the resulted format will be NOT in WAV, then I take no responsibility for such format? What'south wrong? Must WAV exist always amend than MP3 by quality? Does information technology have such minuses? What's the perfect way (format) to get normal audio from Reaper? Is it a "try-mode" or at that place is a commonly used result? MP3 sounds best for me from all formats which I got, except small-scale mettalic sound at about i second. Well, I'm going to buy at terminal the full PRO version of Reaper

04-22-2015, 02:59 AM	#35
Human beingness with feelings Join Appointment: Feb 2007 Location: Oulu, Finland Posts: 8,062	Quote: Originally Posted by tramway11 But WAV which I got from Reaper has poorer sound quality than MP3 You are imagining things or doing something very wrong. (Or possibly experiencing some strange side effect of a very buggy 3rd party plugin.) Quote: Originally Posted by tramway11 Well, I'thousand going to buy at last the full PRO version of Reaper The commercial license won't change annihilation in terms of how rendering to mp3 or wav works, so don't become disappointed if you still don't go things working as you expect. The free download of Reaper works exactly the aforementioned every bit the licensed copy, except for the 6 second nag screen. __________________ I am no longer part of the REAPER customs. Please don't contact me with any REAPER-related problems.

04-22-2015, 03:02 AM	#36
Human existence with feelings Join Date: Mar 2013 Posts: 139	I use several VSTi from NI, perhaps this due to not very powerful notebook? For example, the must quality of audio often appears not at once, when I'm playing my runway with VSTi. Equally if notebook needs some fourth dimension to collect all instruments and play the resulting mix finely (the offset play often plays blurry)

04-22-2015, 03:45 AM	#37
Man being with feelings Join Engagement: Dec 2014 Location: Ruhr Area, Federal republic of germany Posts: 976	My friend, information technology seems you lot have more urgent problems to solve, than your licence question, if WAV sounds worse than MP3 and your notebook is not powerful enough for your NI Instruments. I use NI Komplete 10 Ultimate on a 5 year old notebook with i7 quad core with 6 GB RAM and have no performance issues even at 96 kHz ... only to give an example. __________________ Greetings from Germany Chris

04-22-2015, 04:24 AM	#38
Man with feelings Join Engagement: Mar 2013 Posts: 139	Well, and if I motion Reaper to another more powerful notebook (similar like yours), can I have return result with better quality, assuming that the record already exists? Maybe I must apply "Save live output to deejay"? What's difference between live output in WAV and Rendering in WAV? Last edited by tramway11; 04-22-2015 at 04:31 AM.

04-22-2015, 05:09 AM	#39
Man beingness with feelings Bring together Date: Mar 2013 Posts: 139	Well, what I hear when I press playback in Reaper suits me. The chore is to save this to a file that suits for Youtube without distortions... All I can do is to endeavour all choices from Reaper's files or alive output...

04-22-2015, 05:23 AM	#40
Human existence with feelings Join Date: October 2011 Location: Dalriada Posts: 13,368	Youtube...mp3 licensing fears....audio distortion....youtube file conversion....tape live output instead of rendering...... why don't you just claw your laptop up to your hifi, record it onto a cassette, and mail service it to Youtube? With all the money you lot make from the beginning 1 you lot can invest in other higher quality methods of circumventing common sense.

Posting Rules You may not post new threads You lot may not post replies Y'all may not mail service attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] lawmaking is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules

Forum Leap

All times are GMT -7. The fourth dimension at present is 11:x AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version iii.8.xi
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

darrfelly1980.blogspot.com

Source: https://forum.cockos.com/showthread.php?t=158664

Share this post